Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Phytochemical screening, cytotoxicity and acute toxicity of Annona vepretorum Mart (Annonaceae) leaf extracts

Mariana G e Silva1, Ana P de Oliveira1, Camila de S Araújo1, Érica M de Lavor1, Juliane C Silva1, Rosemairy L Mendes2, Cláudia do Ó Pessoa3, Marcília P Costa4, Jackson R G da S Almeida1

1Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas de Plantas Medicinais (NEPLAME); 2Colegiado de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, 56.304-205, Petrolina, Pernambuco; 3Universidade Federal do Ceará, 60.430-270, Fortaleza, Ceará; 4Universidade Federal do Piauí, 64.049-550, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.

For correspondence:-  Jackson Almeida   Email: jackson.guedes@univasf.edu.br   Tel:+558721016796

Received: 22 January 2016        Accepted: 9 February 2017        Published: 31 March 2017

Citation: Silva MG, Oliveira AP, Araújo Cd, Lavor &M, Silva JC, Mendes RL, et al. Phytochemical screening, cytotoxicity and acute toxicity of Annona vepretorum Mart (Annonaceae) leaf extracts. Trop J Pharm Res 2017; 16(3):597-604 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v16i3.14

© 2017 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the phytochemistry, cytotoxicity and acute toxicity of leaf extracts from Annona vepretorum.
Methods: The crude extracts were obtained by maceration with hexane and methanol. The crude methanol extract was suspended in a 3:7 (v/v) mixture of methanol (MeOH) and water (H2O) and partitioned with hexane, chloroform (CHCl3) and ethyl acetate (AcOEt) in ascending order of polarity to obtain the respective extracts. In the investigation of phytochemical profile, the extracts were evaluated on thin layer chromatography (TLC) plates of silica gel. Cytotoxicity was tested using 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) (MTS) assays against tumor cell lines, viz, HCT-116 (colon), SF-295 (brain), HL-60 (leukemic) and Sarcoma-180. Acute toxicity study was performed by administration of a single oral dose of 2 g/kg body weight of the extracts to mice and the animals were observed for 14 days.
Results: Phytochemical screening results showed that A. vepretorum extracts contain alkaloids, flavonoids and terpenes. Methanol and chloroform extracts exhibited high cytotoxic activity against HCT-116, HL-60 and Sarcoma-180. Moreover, the extracts displayed low toxicity in mice, as no deaths and pronounced toxic effects were observed.
Conclusion: A. vepretorum contains a variety of secondary metabolites which may confer on this species high cytotoxic activity. In addition, the oral administration of the extracts produced low toxicity in mice

Keywords: Annonaceae, Annona vepretorum, Phytochemistry, Tumor cell lines, Acute toxicity

Introduction

The Annonaceae family comprises about 2300-2500 species and over 130 genera distributed mainly in the tropical and subtropical regions [1,2]. In Brazil there are about 29 genera and about 260 species, the majority occurring in forests, with few representatives in open areas [3]. This family is characterized by the presence of terpenoids (mainly diterpenes), alkaloids (particularly isoquinoline derivatives) and essential oils with predominant composition of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes [4,5]. Another class of substances found in this family is the acetogenins of Annonaceae, which have many biological activities, and one of the most important is the antitumor activity [6].

The genus Annona L. comprises approximately 175 species of trees and shrubs [7]. It has geographical distribution in Brazil where there are about 81 species of which 24 are endemic and occur in regions like the Amazon, Caatinga, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest and Pantanal [8]. This genus has great economic importance because of their edible fruits and it has been heavily researched due to the isolation and characterization of several classes of substances with important pharmacological properties such as cytotoxic, antitumor, pesticide, vermicide, antimicrobial, immunosuppressive, anti-emetic, inhibiting appetite and antimalarial [4,9]. Annona vepretorum Mart. is an endemic species of Brazil (Caatinga biome) and is popularly known as “pinha da Caatinga” [8]. Its fruits are an important source of nutrition, being consumed raw or in the form of juices. Its roots have popular medicinal indication to bite of bees and snakes, inflammation and pain, while the leaves are used in bath to allergies, skin diseases, yeast and bacterial infections [10].

Previous studies on this species demonstrated that the essential oil from the leaves of A. vepretorum showed trypanocidal and antifungal activity and that bicyclogermacrene, spathulenol and α-phellandrene are the major constituents of the essential oil [11]. Another study showed the presence of spathulenol, limonene, caryophyllene oxide and α-pinene in essential oil and a weak antioxidant activity [12]. It was reported that the ethanol extract of the leaves of A. vepretorum has sedative effect in mice without affecting motor coordination of the animals [13]. In addition, research has shown that the ethanol extract has anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive activity, which is related probably with the activation of opioid receptors and inhibition of release of mediators of the inflammatory process [14]. Antioxidant, cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities have also been reported for this plant [15].

In this paper, we carried out the phytochemical investigation and evaluation of cytotoxicity and acute toxicity of leaf extracts from Annona vepretorum.

Methods

Plant material

The leaves of Annona vepretorum Mart. were collected in the city of Petrolina, State of Pernambuco, Brazil, in April 2015. The samples were identified by Prof José Alves de Siqueira Filho, from Centro de Recuperação de Áreas Degradadas da Caatinga (CRAD). A voucher specimen (#18350) was deposited at the Herbarium Vale do São Francisco (HVASF), of the Federal University of São Francisco Valley (UNIVASF).

Preparation of extracts

A. vepretorum leaves (1.100 g) were dried in an air circulation oven at 40 °C during 72 h and then were sprayed in a knife mill. The dried and pulverized leaves of A. vepretorum (412 g) were subjected to exhaustive maceration with hexane (Hex) and then with methanol (MeOH) with renewal of the extractor fluid every 72 h. The crude extracts were concentrated under vacuum, yielding 10 g of crude hexane extract (Av-HexC) and 83 g of crude methanol extract (Av-MeOH). A portion of the methanol extract (80 g) was suspended in a 3:7 (v/v) mixture of methanol (MeOH) and water (H2O) and partitioned with hexane, chloroform (CHCl3) and ethyl acetate (AcOEt) in ascending order of polarity to obtain the respective extracts (Av-Hex 9.15 g; Av-CHCl3 4.35 g; Av-AcOEt 5.45 g and Av-H2O 40.0 g).

Qualitative analysis of phytochemicals

The extracts were evaluated on thin-layer chromatography plates of silica gel 60 F254 aluminum supports, applied with a micropipette and eluted in different solvent systems as described by Wagner and Bladt [16], seeking to highlight the main groups of secondary metabolites ().

Cell lines and culture

Human tumor cell lines used, HCT-116 (colon), SF-295 (glioblastoma) and HL-60 (leukemic) were supplied by the National Cancer Institute (USA) and were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum and 1 % of antibiotics, kept in oven at 37 °C and atmosphere containing 5 % CO2.

Murine tumor cell line, Sarcoma-180, were maintained in the peritoneal cavity of Swiss mice. The adult animals (90 days age, 30 - 40 g) were randomly housed in appropriate cages at 22 ± 2 °C on a 12 h light/dark cycle (lights on at 6:00 am) with access to food and water ad libitum. For the in vitro cytotoxicity assay, the cell line were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum, sodium bicarbonate, 25 mM HEPES, L-glutamine 300 mg/L, gentamicin sulfate 50 mg/L and amphotericin B 2 mg/L, kept in oven at 37 °C.

Determination of cytotoxicity

Human tumor cell lines were plated in 96-well plates: HCT-116 (0.7 × 105 cells/mL), SF-295 (0.1 × 106 cells/mL) and HL-60 (0.3 × 106 cells/mL). The plates were incubated with the extracts (50 µg/mL) dissolved in 1% DMSO for 72 h in an incubator at 5% CO2 at 37 °C. At the end of this, they were centrifuged and the supernatant removed. Thereafter, a 150 µL solution of 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) was added, and the plates incubated for 3 h. After incubation, the plates were centrifuged again to remove the MTT solution. The absorbance was read after solubilization of the formazan precipitate with 150 µL of pure DMSO at 595 nm spectrophotometer plate.

Sarcoma-180 cells maintained in vivo were added with phosphate buffer (PBS) and subsequently centrifuged (1200 rpm for 3 min). The supernatant was discarded and Cells were re-suspended in RPMI-1640 medium. The cells were then seeded (1 × 105 cells/well suspended in 50 μL of medium) in 96-well plates and incubated with the extracts (50 µg/mL) dissolved in 1% DMSO for 24 h at 37 °C. After 24 h, 0.02 mL of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxy methoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) in a concentration of 5 mg/mL was added to each well. After incubation for 3 h, the absorbance (Abs) was read at 492 nm on spectrophotometer plate and the cell proliferation inhibition (P) was calculated using Eq 1.

P (%) = 100 – {(At/Au)}100 ………………….. (1)

where At and Au are the absorbance of treated and untreated cells, respectively.

The concentration that caused 50 % cell growth inhibition (IC50) was determined from the concentration-response curves by non-linear regression with a confidence interval of 95 %. An intensity scale was used to assess the cytotoxic potential of the tested samples: samples without activity (SA), with weak activity (cell growth inhibition ranging from 1 to 50 %), with moderate activity (cell growth inhibition ranging from 50 to 75 %) and strong activity (cell growth inhibition ranging from 75 to 100 %).

Acute toxicity test

The acute toxicity study was performed according to OECD 423 Guidelines for testing of chemicals [17]. The mice were randomly divided into 7 groups of 3 female mice. Group I: normal control group, and the mice received vehicle (saline/0.2 % Tween 80); Group II: 2 g/kg body weight Av-MeOH; Group III: 2 g/kg body weight Av-HexC; Group IV: 2 g/kg body weight Av-Hex; Group V: 2 g/kg body weight Av-CHCl3; Group VI: 2 g/kg body weight Av-AcEtOH; Group VII: 2 g/kg body weight Av-H2O. After administration of the extract, the animals were observed every 30 min for 4 h on the first day and once daily for 14 days. During this period the emergence of general toxic signs was assessed [18]. The LD50 of the extracts was investigated based on the eventual observation of mortality. The mice were assessed daily throughout the study to monitor their body weight variation, consumption of food and water. Experimental protocols and procedures were approved by the Federal University of San Francisco Valley Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol no. 0018/140415).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism® 5.0 software. The experimental results were analyzed employing the Student’s t test. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

Results

Phytochemical profile

The phytochemical analysis of A. vepretorum showed that almost all extracts, except the crude hexane extract (Av-HexC), were positive for the presence of flavonoids. The methanol, hexane, chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts also showed positive reaction for the presence of alkaloids. Only the aqueous extract was not positive for the presence of monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, diterpenes, triterpenes and steroids. The methanol and ethyl acetate extracts were positive for anthocyanins. The chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts were positive for naphthoquinones and hydrolysable tannins. Only the ethyl acetate extract was positive for saponins.  All extracts of A. vepretorum showed negative results for the presence of anthraquinones, anthracene derivatives, lignans, naphtoquinones, condensed tannins and xanthine. These results are presented in .

Cytotoxicity

The methanol and chloroform extracts showed a high cytotoxic potential in three of the tested lines (HCT-116, HL-60 and Sarcoma-180). The crude hexane extract had a high cytotoxic potential in glioblastoma line (SF-295) and Sarcoma-180. The hexane partition and aqueous extracts showed high cytotoxic activity only in sarcoma-180 cell line. The ethyl acetate extract had an activity ranging from low to moderate in cell lines ().

Acute toxicity

In the evaluation of the acute toxicity of extracts obtained from the leaves of A. vepretorum there was no death or signs of toxicity in any of the groups that received a single dose of extract and were assessed for 14 days of the experiment. The animal treated with the extracts showed some significant changes in body weight when compared with the control group (). The results for evaluation of acute toxicity are presented in , and , and represent the mean values obtained in the first and in the last 7 days as well as the mean values after 14 days.

Water consumption was increased in the treated groups compared to the control (). As well as for the feed intake, there was only increased consumption in the group treated with the methanol extract when we calculate the average consumption for 14 days of evaluation ().

Discussion

Investigations about the chemical composition of plants of Caatinga that are traditionally used to treat various diseases had identified secondary metabolites with promising pharmacological activities [13]. Phytochemical analysis showed the presence of flavonoids, except in crude hexane extract (Av-HexC), confirming previous studies with A. vepretorum [15]. A large number of biological activities have been attributed to these compounds, including anticancer activity [19]. It was also demonstrated the presence of alkaloids and terpenes in the extracts [4].

MTT assay is a well-known colorimetric assay that is based on the enzymatic reduction of the tetrazolium salt MTT to a formazan product in viable cells. It has been largely used to determine cytostatic/cytotoxic potential of medicinal agents in screening programs [20]. The MTS assay has the same general principle of MTT test. Those extracts that caused more than 75% cell growth inhibition in any cell line were considered active. Thus, only the methanol extract and chloroform extract showed strong activity against human tumor cell lines. On Sarcoma-180, the extracts showed strong activity, but the ethyl acetate extract showed moderate activity.

According to the American National Cancer Institute, the IC50 threshold for considering a promising extract for cancer treatment should be less than 50 μg/mL [21]. Thus, the methanol extract, crude hexane extract, partitioned hexane extract, chloroform and ethyl acetate presented promising results based on the IC50 values, which could be attributed to the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids and terpenes, since these classes of secondary metabolites have cytotoxic activity [22-24].

The majority (60 %) of anticancer drugs introduced into therapy has its origin in natural products, however, most chemotherapeutic drugs used in clinical practice are not selective for tumor cells, causing severe side effects. Thus, it is critical to characterize the toxicity profile of potential candidates for antitumor agents [25].  It was observed that a single oral administration of 2 g/kg body weight extracts of A. vepretorum leaves did not cause any mortality or alteration in behavioural or physiological state of animals indicating that the plant extracts are not toxic at the tested dose and that its LD50 is likely to be greater than 2 g/kg.

Analysis of the body weight () of treated animals with the extracts showed some differences when compared with the control. However, there was no marked weight loss of animals over the 14 days of evaluation. Generally, changes in these parameters reflect its toxic effects, especially if such loss is greater than 10% of the initial weight [26].

The analysis of the ingestion of food and water is an important parameter to investigate the safety of the substances studied for therapeutic purpose, particularly for substances which exhibit indicative of gastrointestinal toxicity, which may cause decreased intake of feed and water, and hence weight loss [27]. In contrast, there was an increase of water consumption in the treated groups compared with the control. As well as for the feed intake, there was only a statistically significant increase in consumption in the group treated with methanol extract compared to the control, demonstrating the low toxicity of the extracts.

Conclusion

A. vepretorum contains a variety of secondary metabolites which may confer on this species the capacity to inhibit the growth of human tumor cell lines and sarcoma-180 in vitro. Moreover, the administration of a single dose of the extracts shows low toxicity in mice. Thus, A. vepretorum is a potential source of bioactive compounds with cytotoxic activity and low oral toxicity, which should be further investigated in the search for new molecules with potential anticancer activity.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Brazilian National Agencies CAPES, CNPq, FACEPE and FUNCAPE for financial support for the work.

References

  1. Carballo AI, Martínez AL, González-trujano E, Pellicer F, Ventura-martínez R, Díaz- reval MI, López-Muñoz FJ. Antinociceptive activity of Annona diversifolia Saff. leaf extracts and palmitone as a bioactive compound. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2010; 95: 6-12.
  2. Heywood VH. Flowering plants of the world. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1985.
  3. Maas PJM, Kamer HM, Junikka L, Mello-Silva RD, Rainer H. Annonaceae from Central-eastern Brazil. Rodriguésia 2001; 52: 65-98.
  4. Leboeuf M, Cavé A, Bhaumik PK, Mukherjee B, Mukherjee R. The phytochemistry of the Annonaceae. Phytochemistry 1982; 21: 2783-2813.
  5. Silva MS, Tavares JF, Queiroga KF, Agra MF, Barbosa-Filho JM, Almeida JRGS, Silva SAS. Alkaloids and other constituents from Xylopia langsdorffiana (Annonaceae). Quím Nova 2009; 32: 1566-1570.
  6. Nascimento FC, Boaventura MAD, Assunção ACS, Pimenta LPS. Acetogeninas de anonáceas isoladas de folhas de Rollinia laurifolia. Quím Nova 2003; 26: 319-322.
  7. Dutra LM, Costa EV, Moraes VRS, Nogueira PCL, Vendramin ME, Barison A, Prata APN. Chemical constituents from the leaves of Annona pickelii (Annonaceae). Biochem Syst Ecol 2012; 41: 115-118.
  8. Maas P, Lobão A, Rainer H. Annonaceae in Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. [updated 2015 Jan 23; cited 2015 Nov 23]. Available from:http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/florado brasil/FB110235
  9. Santos TG, Rebelo RA, Dalmarco EM, Guedes A, Gasper AL, Cruz AB, Schimit AP, Cruz RCB, Steindel M, Nunes RK. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of leaf essential oil from Piper malacophyllum (C. Presl.) C. DC. Quím Nova 2012; 35: 477-481.
  10. Dutra LM, Bomfim LM, Rocha SLA, Nepel A, Soares MBP, Barison A, Costa EV, Bezerra DP. ent-Kaurane diterpenes from the stem bark of Annona vepretorum (Annonaceae) and cytotoxic evaluation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014; 24: 3315-3320.
  11. Costa EV, Dutra LM, Nogueira PCL, Moraes VRS, Salvador MJ, Ribeiro LHG, Gadelha FR. Essential oil from the leaves of Annona vepretorum: chemical composition and bioactivity. Nat Prod Commun. 2012; 7: 265-266.
  12. Araújo CS, Oliveira AP, Lima RN, Alves PB, Diniz TC, Almeida JRGS. Chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of the essential oil from leaves of Annona vepretorum Mart. (Annonaceae). Pharmacogn Mag 2015; 43: 616-618.
  13. Diniz TC, Araújo CS, Silva JC, Oliveira-Júnior RG, Lima-Saraiva SRG, Quintans-Júnior LJ, Nunes XP, Almeida JRGSJ.  Phytochemical screening and central nervous system effects of ethanolic extract of Annona vepretorum (Annonaceae) in mice. J. Med. Plant Res. 2013, 7, 2729.
  14. Silva JC, Araújo CS, Lima-Saraiva SRG, Oliveira Junior RG, Diniz TC, Wanderley CWS, Palheta-Júnior RC, Mendes RL, Guimaraes AG, Quintans-Junior LJ, Almeida JRGS. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of the ethanolic extract of Annona vepretorum Mart. (Annonaceae) in rodents. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine (Online) 2015; 15: 1-10.
  15. Almeida JRGS, Araújo CS, Pessoa CO, Costa MP, Pacheco AGM. Atividade antioxidante, citotóxica e antimicrobiana de Annona vepretorum Mart. (Annonaceae). Rev Bras Frutic 2014; 36: 258-264.
  16. Wagner H, Bladt S. Plant drug analysis: a thin layer chromatography atlas. Berlim Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. 1996: 384.
  17. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals – Acute Oral Toxicity methods. No. 423, 2001: 1-13.
  18. Almeida RN, Falcão ACGM, Diniz RST, Quintans-Júnior LJ, Polari RN, Barbosa-Filho JM, Agra MF, Duarte JC, Ferreira CD, Antoniolli AR, Araújo CC. Metodologia para avaliação de plantas com atividade no sistema nervoso central e alguns dados experimentais. Rev Bras Farm 1999; 80: 72-76.
  19. VEGA, Maria R. G. et al. Flavonoids from Annona dioica leaves and their effects in Ehrlich carcinoma cells, DNA-topoisomerase I and II. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2007;18: 1554-1559.
  20. Sandra SR, Aline MJ, Charlene SA, Thanany BS, Alan DCS, Jemmyson RJ, Moacir SA, Tais SS, Wesley FG, Péricles BA, et al. Evaluation of the Cytotoxic Activity of Some Brazilian Medicinal Plants. Planta Med. 2012; 78: 1601-1606.
  21. Renzi D, Valtolina M, Foster R. The evaluation of a multi-endpoint cytotoxicity assay system. ATLA-Altern. Lab. Anim. 1993; 21: 89–96.
  22. Vila-Nova, N. S. Leishmanicidal activity and cytotoxicity of compounds from two Annonaceae species cultivated in Northeastern Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2011; 44: 567-571.
  23. Katrin S. Cytotoxicity of dietary flavonoids on different human cancer types. Pharmacogn Rev. 2014; 8: 122–146.
  24. Mathabe MC, Hussein AA, Nikolova RV, Basson AE, Meyer JJ, Lall N. Antibacterial activities and cytotoxicity of terpenoids isolated from Spirostachys africana. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008; 116: 194-197.
  25. Mondal S, Bandyopadhyay S, Ghosh MK, Mukhopadhyay S, Roy S, Mandal C. Natural products: promising resources for cancer drug discovery Anticancer Agents. Med Chem. 2012; 12: 49-75.
  26. Subramanion LJ, Zuraini Z, Yeng C, Yee LL, Lachimanan YL, Sreenivasan, S. Acute oral toxicity of methanolic seed extract of Cassia fistula in mice. Molecules 2011; 16: 5268-5282.
  27. Mukinda JT, Eagles PFK. Acute and subchronic oral toxicity profiles of the aqueous extract of Polygala fruticosa in female mice and rats. J Ethnopharmacol 2010; 128: 236-240.
Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates